Their frequency response balance is … The AKG K701 look almost identical to the K702 and K712 PRO. Curabitur lobortis January 19, 2016. The flatter the frequency response – … This is achieved by using revolutionary flat-wire voice coils and a … AKG K701. Deviations in different severities at different frequency bands have an effect on the sound character. NO SMOOTHING is applied to the shown plots. This makes the bass sound ‘light’ but ‘tight’. By contrast, the K712s are much smoother through this frequency region and, as a consequence, are more revealing of detail in the mix. Gain early access to all tests results for new products, Prices will now be listed directly in reviews and tables, Have 5 votes per product category to choose which product we’ll review next, Gain unlimited access to detailed test results in tools and results (no blurred results), Best Wireless Bluetooth Earbuds For Running, Best Noise Cancelling Headphones Under $200, Best Wireless Bluetooth Earbuds Under $50, Best Noise Cancelling Earbuds And In-Ears, Best Wireless Bluetooth Headphones Under $100, Best Noise Cancelling Headphones Under $100, Video: The 3 Best Gaming Headsets For PS5 (2021), Wyze Noise-Cancelling Headphones Wireless Test Results, EPOS GTW 270 Hybrid Truly Wireless Review, Having trouble deciding between two headphones? Impedance: 65Ω The Philips are also more comfortable for long listening sessions, although the AKG feel more durable. Be part of the most informed community and take advantage of our advanced tools to find the best product for your needs. The 5dB ‘dip’ around kHz is audible and makes the K712 sound a bit less ‘edgy’ / ‘forward’. They have two-tone navy blue and silver color scheme and an old-school retro design that will work for some. AKG K612. On the other hand, the AKG don't feel as tight as the Beyerdynamic, which is more comfortable for … The black/dark-blue and chrome accents give it a different look compared to the white K701. Note: the rather large ‘dip’ aroound 3.5kHz in the K7XX (and K712) are a measurement error because there is no pinna. The AKG K702 is a sturdy work horse. Due to their open-back design, these headphones don't offer any isolation below 1KHz. The K702 get a bit more bass but also sound brighter - unfortunately, to the point of sounding a bit sharp. The elevated upper mids and treble that is responsible for the bright character can be lowered to normal levels using a passive electronic filter. AKG K702 - With the K702, AKG adds a studio headphone heavyweight to its portfolio, with precise sound reproduction for mixing and mastering applications. A ‘horizontal‘ frequency response curve on the shown frequency response plots on this website thus indicates a perceived ‘flat’ tonal signature. The K702's are reference, open, over-ear studio headphones for precision listening, mixing and mastering. akg k712 graph February 15, 2021. © 2021 9298-5266 Quebec Inc. All Rights Reserved. The treble is over accentuated and has enough ‘air’ but isn’t really ‘smooth’. The step response plot below  (Left, Right)This plot shows the impulse response/clarity is accentuated and peaks out 4dB above the mids. Above 18kHz the response drops off quickly but still shows response at least up to 30kHz. Bass extension isn’t great and it starts to audibly roll-off from 100Hz down. The ringing goes on for quite some time and is seen in the entire plot. It is an open headphone with a detachable cable, slightly slanted pads and a different color scheme. Sound-wise, the AKG might lack a bit of sub-bass when compared to the Beyerdynamic and could sound a bit sharper on higher frequencies. Comparison Tools. ... the pads on my K702 are squished to hell. The AKG K702 are slightly better headphones than the AKG K701, but overall are very similar. Quand on passe de l’un à l’autre la première sensation est que le AKG … AKG K702. Sound-wise, the AKG might lack a bit of sub-bass when compared to the Beyerdynamic and could sound a bit sharper on higher frequencies. The AKG K612 is the successor of the K601. Audio Frequency Bandwidth 12-39500 Hz 10-39800 Hz 10 ... 1MORE E1001 Triple Driver, queste AKG K702 con il cavo in sostituzione a quello originale, Beyerdynamic DT990 Pro, FiiO X5 III e FiiO A5. Stock K702 vs filtered K702. Long ago, the K701/702 were both designed and manufactured in Austria. They have the same retro design with large circular ear cups and a headband with a self-adjusting strap. I sent an email to AKG asking if the design had been modified in order to make it more appealing to the larger numbers of audiophiles at the expense of the relatively small number of recording studio enthusiasts. As the seal of a headphone is of importance some experiments are done to see the effect. This plot looks quite good below 500Hz. frequency response graphs, … But the drivers are IDENTICAL to both the K701 and K702. Most people won’t hear a difference between those two models. L and R markings are located on the headband. It powered my old AKG K500 enough to even give it some more slam in the low-end. Weight: 235 g. When you look at the two versions of the graphs at headphone.com here is the result: 20Hz -> 20kHz low end peak/bottom - high end peak/bottom difference: k702 Default version: 6dB Raw version: 20dB k712 Default version: 14dB The AKG 702 are very comfortable headphones. Also, the detachable cable locks into the ear cups and will pull the headphones off your head before disconnecting if ever it's hooked on something. Equipment Forums. The only real longevity issue is the elastic bands that aren’t easily replaced by owners. They purposely don't block any ambient noise, which is not ideal for the level of noise on a busy commute. In order to get an idea of the headphones you're most likely to enjoy, it's important to also understand how different frequency response ranges impact sound signature. Below the square-wave response of the K702. Each had those annoying head band bumps that a lot of people complained about. The AKG K712 Pro is a direct descendent of the classic K701, using a very similar physical design, ... as seen in the frequency response graph. 10. share. Headphones (full-size) ... Or one had been recently used and the other was brand new since frequency response changes with use. The open back ear cups are large and circular and covered in a suede-like padding that gives the headphones a premium appeal. The shape of your head, bone structure, pad size, pad ‘softness,  (compliance), hair or no hair and or wearing glasses may (drastically) change the frequency response of some headphones, so… your personal experience may differ substantially from these plots. Is the K702 with K712 pads exactly the same as a K712 ? Back to Graph Database. The cable has a 3-pin mini XLR on the headphone side and a goldplated 3.5mm TRS with a gold plated screw-on 6.3mm adapter. Impedance In-Ear Fidelity is supported by the following: Support those who support us! Frequency Response Graph Unfortunately I can’t find a frequency graph for the K612 (at the time of writing) – so I’ve used the K702 and K601 graphs – mainly because it fairly closely matches what I think I’m hearing. The AKG K702 is a modernised K701. Poor isolaton. The AKG K7XX (red) is a Drop only product. Frequency response graphs are your friend here. When they eventually do graph the 612 I’ll update the chart. Here, you can find also very good review of DT880 and K702 – must read!. In keeping with tradition, AKG’s fixed-length headband is the first showcase of this design philosophy. This way the plots are overlaid and it is easier to show the tonal balance differences.The headphone does not react much to higher output resistances other than in level (9.4dB). IEM Graph Comparison Tool. Some headphones will go as wide as 5Hz – 40,000Hz, however from 20,000Hz additional range doesn’t matter much, because we can’t hear those frequencies anyway. Think of it as flavours, like in ice-cream. Above 10kHz the resonances are visible but are also short. Efficiency: 90dB/1mW (103dB/1V) It is available in black with very dark blue and matte aluminium accents. Upper treble is 1dB higher in level though. Related: AKG K701 vs. K702 However, I quickly become tired of the sharpness and was looking for a way to make it sound "warmer". They're super comfortable headphones with a few more accessories than the K701 or the K702.However, like the previous models, they're a bit bulky and cumbersome for everyday use. Nom. so that you can compare the results easily. The pads are large enough in inner diameter (60mm) and have a nice depth (25mm) so most ears will fit. Home. I own the K702 and absolutely love it for flat, even frequency response (for the most part). However, the Q701 are more expensive for such a marginal difference. The AKG K702 and the Beyerdynamic DT 880 are both great audiophile headphones if you like a neutral sound. The schematic for it is shown below. IEM Graph Comparison Tool (Premium) Headphone Graph Comparison Tool. The mids from 200Hz to 1kHz are pretty flat and make the mids sound ‘neutral’. ... AKG K701 or K702 is the Subsekt go to's. Usually I don’t post them unless something is wrong but in this case I will post the plot. Max. To test this the headphone is measured via a low impedance amplifier (0.2Ω) and a high impedance amplifier (120Ω). It can also be used for the K612 and K701. They have the same retro design with large circular ear cups and a headband with a self-adjusting strap. Below the frequency response of the K702 (Left, Right)There is a slight but not audible channel imbalance. Frequency Response. Female vocals are a bit more forward on the DT 880 Pro; sometimes the K7xx places acoustic instruments in front of female vocals, not that this is inherently a bad thing. The open-back ear cups are well padded and covered in a suede-like fabric that gives the headphones a more premium appeal. 'neutral', whereby all the frequencies are reproduced at roughly the same level across the audio spectrum), but after a few days of constantly working with them I became disenchanted because they sounded somewhat veiled … The retro headband design is also quite large and results in a headphone that's cumbersome to carry around, and that will only fit in a backpack. voltage: 3.5V The headphone is light in weight. The AKG Q701 are basically the same headphones as the AKG K702, but with slightly better sound performance. Drum hits etc. Bass hardly reacts. The open back ear cups are large and circular and covered in a suede-like padding that gives the headphones a premium appeal. Build quality is decent for the AKG K702. We’ll get into that in a bit. Demo units courtesy of: Frequency Response measurements and graphs for In-Ear Monitors (IEMs) and earphones. As far as AKG goes, I'd only briefly auditioned their cans in passing ... as the enclosure seems to vibrate a lot when the bass comes in. These headphones are not tight enough and will easily fall your head if used while running. We’ll get into that in a bit. Recent Comment. Most measurement sites have some smoothing applied which ‘irons flat’ sharp peaks and ‘wiggles’. The resonances shift in frequency when the ear-driver distance changes. Isolation: low (open headphone) The AKG K702 share the same style and build as the AKG K701 and AKG K712 PRO. You may go with the K702 as overall it’s a bit more neutral sounding than the K712. However, the AKG are well-built but don’t feel as durable since they don’t have a full metal frame like the Beyerdynamic. 160 St-Viateur Est, Suite 408, Montreal, Canada, H2T 1A8. Perhaps the only real difference is color and the fixed cable to justify the price difference. Below the K702 vs the K7XX.The K702 is much more ‘brighter’ but is lacking in the lower bass. However, they pretty big and bulky for everyday use. The K702 is also a fantastic purchase, and has a bit of a different sound signature. Long ago, the K701/702 were both designed and manufactured in Austria. It means that they are able to output these frequencies. Below an aid to help determining the sound character of headphones with relation to the frequency response. Although these headphones are quite loud and leak a lot, the profile of the leakage is narrower that most open headphones we have measured. October 8, 2016. They have fairly similar sound profiles, although the AKG adds a bit of extra emphasis to the clarity and detail of vocals and instruments, while the Beyerdynamic emphasize more of the sibilance range. Below an aid to help determining the sound character of headphones with relation to the frequency response. admin. Below: Perfect seal, a small seal breach by thin armed (reading) glasses just above the skin, thick armed glasses and a big seal breach.A seal breach isn’t really problematic at all. Published: Feb-3-2020, updated: Aug-8-2020. The AKG K371 headphones are very similar to the AKG K361 model. The AKG K712 PRO deliver a great sound for critical listening. Adaptatio… This also points toward less refined treble. This tool will clearly show you the differences, Use our data and table to find the best headphones for your needs, Want to see us review a specific headphones? Clamping force: medium The FR is like the branding at the side of the tub telling you the flavour of the ice cream. ... i.e. The K702 are comfortable and reproduce tracks with great fidelity. beyerdynamic DT 990 pro VS. AKG K702 Advice. : 113dB This led me to suspect that the first graph refers to the K702 that was made in Austria, whilst the second is related to the later Chinese manufactured version. According to response graphs, these are are much flatter than the K702 from 80Hz all the way up to 7kHz ... AKG K702: Industry standard openback headphones. The AKG K702 and the Philips SHP9500 are both great audiophile headphones if you like a neutral sound. And by Over-ear, It means that the earcups of this headphone cover the whole ears of the users. Update: AKG has also K702 model (around 950-1000plz) – also pretty good with detachable cable (potential for upgrades!) It shows no linearity issues at all, they all overlay. You want flat because then the sound your working on is actually there in the audio and it will translate better to other speakers and systems. The tonal balance is hardly changed when listening to these headphones with or without glasses. The jagged response above 5kHz makes the treble a bit ‘coarse’. Thank you so much for this. This is a comfortable headphone that can be tweaked in sound by using different AKG pads. Usage: Home, Studio This headphone is quite comfortable and can be worn for long periods without getting too ‘hot’ on the ears. At the same time, the AKG are more comfortable and have a wider soundstage that's perceived as coming from in front rather than from inside the listener's head. The pads are velour with standard foam inside and have a 5° angle . They combine an extremely accurate response with agility and spaciousness. This creates a decent seal which slowly conforms to the head over the years. For the going streetprices (around € 140.-) this is a good and comfortable headphone that can take a beating. ... As for the K702 it is mostly used for mid to high frequency referencing, the bass response is really nonexistent. It does not push hard on my head but one does feel a small contact point and the cups have a small tendency to drop a little lower in my case. It sounds a bit too bright and can have a shrill ‘edge’ with some music. With some music there is sibilance. See frequency response graph. I found this (look at the top review, by gabrielnorena) where the user owns both the 65th anniversary edition and the K712, their description of the difference sort of matches your frequency response chart above for the k712 vs k702 with … put them under the same test bench, There is also no case or pouch, which is disappointing. Graphs 101: How to Read Headphone Measurements . Advertising enquiries. They're best used for critical listening in private. power rating: 0.2W (200mW) AKG K7XX Red. On the right side the K702 with the filter.The bass roll-off is easy to see in the 40Hz square-wave. The 100μs pulse shows the correct amplitude but the pulse on the top of the signal shows overshoot and a quite high second pulse that should not be there. Cable: 3m terminated in 6.3mm TRS + 3.5mm adapter There is only one big downside (which is still a problem with similar looking AKG models) which is the elastic bands loose their elasticity over a few years already. The AKG K701 look almost identical to the K702 and K712 PRO. The most interesting part is that the resonances shift a bit because the ear/driver distance changes. The AKG K702 is a modernised K701. S.P.L. Their sound profiles are fairly similar overall, but the AKG sound even brighter. I do not use smoothing because some info about sound quality is lost when plots are smoothed. Also the treble is about 2dB lower which makes the K712 a bit more ‘laidback’ and ‘smoother’ sounding. Nunc pulvinar sollicitudin … But at least the bass is more pronounced and the efficiency is about 4dB higher and fulle sounding. Given its low sensitivity a balanced amplifier could well be beneficial. The K371 has titanium-coated drivers and a greater frequency response extending from 5Hz-40kHz compared to the K361's 15Hz-28kHz frequency response. Below the CSD of the K702. The Sennheiser HD 600 and the AKG K702 are both open-back, over-ear headphones that are similarly suited for critical listening. However, the headband has a lot of moving parts for the adjustable padding. As this is a dynamic headphone the frequency response might be amplifier output resistance dependent when certain higher output resistance amplifiers are used. Around 2kHz there is a little lingering (the small bump in the FR, it seems happy to vibrate at that frequency) but is very low in level. The reviewed headphone has had quite a few hours on it already and was kindly sent in by the owner. The ear cups will sway and slip off you ears, even during mild physical activity. AKG K702. The AKG K240 Studio over-ear, semi-open headphones are designed for professional applications such as mixing, mastering and playback. The AKG K702 has a ‘bright’ tonal balance similar to the K701. Below an aid to help determining the sound character of headphones with relation to the frequency response. The K712 will sound less harsh to most people, but their soundstage isn't as impressive. Driver size: ø 40mm The AKG are also a bit more open-sounding, and they come with a very long and detachable cable while the Beyerdynamic have a short, coiled cable. Hello world! No cherry-picked units sent by brands. The open-back ear cups are well padded and covered in a suede-like fabric that gives the headphones a more premium appeal. Beyond 1ms the signal drops gradually and shows the bass roll-off. What’s clearly visible is that AKG stuck to the AKG house sound over all the years. I've read it's bassier than the Q701. Frequency response (tonal balance) is the most sound-determining aspect of headphones. type: open back fit: circumaural (over ear) impedance: 250 Ohms frequency response: 5 Hz – 35,000 Hz material: velour ear pads, rugged plastic, metal headband: spring steel, soft cushioning … vs. AKG K712 Pro. Revolutionary flat wire voice coil for incredible impulse and treble response New & Used (28) from $309.00 + FREE Shipping. The Beyerdynamic DT 990 PRO and the AKG K702 are both great headphones for critical listeners and have very little difference in performance. The mids look better as the measured signal looks more like the applied square-wave but does show overshoot and a lot of ringing. A guide to reading frequency response graphs of headphones and IEMs. Bass is light but is ‘tight’ and well textured. The effect of this filter is shown below. Both units extend well beyond what the typical adult ear is able to perceive, so a more palpable difference is in weight. A horizontal line shows audible neutral response in the plots on this website. Pinna gain ‘fills-in’ the gap for the largest portion. Below an aid to help determining the sound character of headphones with relation to the frequency response. AKG Pro K702 has a frequency response of 10 Hz to 39,800 Hz. Below the K702 vs the K701 AKG K701 Frequency Response and CSD Waterfall Plots ... As far as I can tell, the 65th AE seems to sound pretty similar to the K701 graphs on here, but with the advertised additional bass. They have two-tone navy blue and silver color scheme and an old-school retro design that will work for some. You can see what products we currently have for sale. Headphone connector: 3-pin mini XLR Below the K702 vs the K501.The K501 is an oldie. It just doesn’t play very loud directly from a  phone and requires quite some volume for the bass to ‘snap’ into the correct level (Fletcher Munson / equal loudness contour curves) I had one and I stumbled on it by accident/luck. The AKG K240 Studio and K240 MKII use the same drivers and have the same frequency responses. The overall sound is ‘open’, dynamic and very ‘forward’ as well as ‘detailed’. They elastic bands be replaced but is expensive and not easy to DIY. Accessories: 3.5mm adapter. Frequency Response Graph Unfortunately I can’t find a frequency graph for the K612 (at the time of writing) – so I’ve used the K702 and K601 graphs – mainly because it fairly closely matches what I think I’m hearing. The 2nd harmonic distortion is probably lower than 0.2% around 1kHz as limits of the test rig are around that level. Forums.
Adobe After Effect Prix, Spot Photo 92, Calife Mots Fléchés 4 Lettres, Polish Cow Lyrics English, Ordinateur De Bureau Lenovo, Conure Molinae A Vendre Belgique, Batwoman Crisis On Infinite Earths Streaming, Connexion Entre 2 Personnes à Distance, Organigramme Transdev île De-france,